Test-Optional’s Hidden Cost: How Low-Income Students Lose Out

Test-optional was meant to expand access. Ironically, for many economically disadvantaged and first-gen students, it can do the opposite. When scores become optional, the admissions spotlight shifts toward signals that are easier to polish with money—premium coursework, paid activities, bespoke coaching, and glossy essays. Here’s how the policy can unintentionally hurt under-resourced applicants—and how students and schools can respond.

1) Underestimating competitiveness = withheld scores

Without a clear requirement, many high-achieving, low-income students misjudge where their scores “fit.” A 1350 SAT from a Title I school can be a powerful positive signal—especially when AP/IB access is limited. But uncertainty leads some students to hide scores that would have helped, reducing odds at selective colleges and for merit aid. Rule of thumb: if your score is near or above a school’s median (the middle of its middle-50%), it usually helps to submit.

2) The arms race shifts to coachable, costly factors

When scores are optional, weight often slides to essays, activities, recommendation letters, and perceived rigor. Those elements are notoriously unequal:

• Affluent students can fund travel teams, research camps, and curated “impact” projects.

• Schools with robust AP/IB menus make “course rigor” easier to show.

• Essay and application coaching can smooth tone, structure, and narrative.

Low-income applicants may have limited course offerings, family work obligations, and fewer structured activities—context that can be impressive when explained, but only if the reader sees it.

3) More applications, tougher odds

Test-optional typically increases application volume. Selectivity rises; admit rates fall. In bigger pools, small advantages—like polished materials or niche extracurriculars—matter more. Students from “advice deserts” (schools with high counselor caseloads or low college-going norms) are less likely to craft savvy lists or hit strategic early deadlines, magnifying the disadvantage.

4) Hidden hit to merit aid

Many campuses still tie merit scholarships to score bands or use scores to calibrate academic awards. Applicants who don’t submit scores—or who misjudge when to submit—can unintentionally take themselves out of the running for thousands of dollars. Even when aid is “holistic,” a strong score can anchor merit decisions in a crowded field.

5) Context is uneven—and that matters

Admissions readers try to contextualize grades and rigor, but context varies by region and reviewer. Grade inflation, different GPAs across districts, and uneven school profiles make it harder to compare applicants without a common data point. For students in under-resourced schools, a solid score can be the quickest way to prove readiness.

What students can do (action plan)

Test at least once. Take a diagnostic, choose digital SAT or ACT, and sit for one official exam (use fee waivers if eligible). You keep the option to submit when it helps.

Use a submit/withhold rule.

• At/above a school’s median → submit.

• Between the 25th–50th percentile → case-by-case (strong grades/rigor? submit).

• Below the 25th percentile → withhold at truly test-optional schools; submit where required.

Leverage free prep. Build a 6–8 week plan: two content blocks + two timed mini-sets weekly, a full practice every 2–3 weeks, and an error log. (Plenty of free official-style resources exist—use them.)

Explain constraints, highlight impact. If you lacked APs, cared for siblings, or worked a job, say so. Frame responsibilities as leadership and time management.

Chase stackable aid. Look beyond institutional merit: community scholarships, local foundations, and employer programs often don’t require test scores—but some do. Track requirements early.

Ask for clarity. Email admissions about middle-50% ranges for your intended major, superscoring, and whether merit uses scores. Answers can guide your strategy.

What colleges can do (to reduce unintended harm)

• Publish major-specific middle-50% ranges and clear guidance on when scores help.

• Contextualize rigor visibly, noting limited course access doesn’t penalize the student.

• De-emphasize coached signals (over-engineered activities) and value sustained family/work responsibilities.

• Expand fee waivers & travel-free options (virtual fly-ins, interviews, portfolio reviews).

• Be transparent about merit. If scores influence awards, say so plainly.

Bottom line

Test-optional isn’t automatically equitable. When scores disappear, wealth-sensitive signals often take their place. For under-resourced students, the smartest play is pragmatic: test once, submit strategically, tell your story with context, and chase every dollar of aid. For colleges, clarity and transparency are the difference between good intentions and real access.

Visit our website:

 www.sapneiltutoring.com  

Give us a call or send us an email anytime!

contact@sapneiltutoring.com